blog/content/posts/2014/01/21/meetings.md
2022-06-25 08:47:06 +01:00

54 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
title: Meetings
date: 2014-01-21 20:13:05
tags: [social]
---
Meetings come in different shapes and forms. Let's chat about them.
# Decisions
Most of the meetings come from the desire to have a decision made. The
problem is in most cases is that these are not decisions to be made now.
Software prototyping is cheap. We should just try to build a working
solution and iterate around. Let's prototype. Get someone most annoyed
with the problem and leave them to build it. Of course, the clearer
communication of what they are actually doing the better. It should be
something like hey Im gonna build this okay or even hey, I've
built that, lets see how it behaves Does not need to be “we should now spend
multiple meetings on discussing how this should be done.
# Sharing the knowledge
Other possible reasoning behind having a meeting can be that of some
knowledge needs to be shared. And that's a noble cause. Just don't make
a meeting out of it. Make a lecture. A presentation. No audience members
interacting with each other. Speaker talking and maybe sometimes
allowing questions. The knowledge sharing sessions are oftentimes a
prelude to the decisionmaking meetings. See above.
# Confirming your ideas
Sometimes however somebody just wants some confirmation on their idea,
maybe before building a prototype. Then, there is a good chance that
they already know who they should ask. No meeting then. Just ask the
people you know you should ask. 1-on-1 interaction. Maybe somebody will
overhear and start listening. Notice that the social dynamic is very
different from the meeting then, two people having a conversation and
another one politely listening, maybe being invited to the conversation
after some while. Just look how it works in between the talks on
conferences. Very different from “everybody says everything” meetings.
# The meetings that are left
Also, if for some reason you really need to have a meeting make
it opt-in. Just the people who are interested coming. Set the timer.
There is one I particularly like - a clock showing amount of money
wasted so far by this meeting.
## Post scriptum
[37 signals on meetings](https://m.signalvnoise.com/meetings-are-toxic/):
These folks have the idea of every communication should be async and read
when convenient, hence their emphasis on email. That gets you to really
think of your proposal and really describe it, which is good. To stop and think, RFC-style.